You are currently viewing Flexible Followers of Multiple Gurus – Confused Sociable Salesmen – 10 Jun 11

Flexible Followers of Multiple Gurus – Confused Sociable Salesmen – 10 Jun 11

Flexible followers of many gurus at once

The opposite of strict followers, who I described yesterday, are flexible followers who don’t mind having several gurus, no, who love having as many gurus as possible. They actually follow whomever they can find. They have hundred pictures of different masters on their altar and they buy every book of every guru.

Flexible followers have a clear advantage here: they can take the positive parts of every guru’s message and just forget what does not fit to them. They can pick the good lessons only and don’t need to go too deep into the dubious rests of every philosophy.

It is easy for them to mingle with all kinds of followers. It doesn’t matter whom the others are following, flexible followers have something positive to say about every guru. The other person obviously likes that and so they keep every other follower happy, too.

Sometimes people who do business in the esoteric scene are this kind of followers. It has many advantages for their business because they can sell their stuff to anybody, irrespective of whom they are following.

One disadvantage is however, that they easily get confused. Each and every of those masters uses different words, sees things in another way and tells his followers different things. If you read a hundred books about enlightenment, you can find a hundred different ways to get there and mixing them up does not always help.

While strict followers of one guru sometimes have problems of intolerance and narrow-mindedness, flexible followers have problems of too much choice, a variety of possibilities that is just too big. They find it hard to find a common factor with all those gurus and cannot really decide which way they should go. They try everything a little bit and unfortunately often get very confused in the effort to follow everyone at once.

Related posts

कृपया ग्लानि न करें यदि किसी की कल्पना करके आपका खड़ा अथवा गीली हो जाए

क्या मोनोगमी अप्राकृतिक है? क्या अपने जीवन साथी के अलावा किसी और के साथ यौन कल्पनाओं का होना मानसिक विकृति ...

Bitte haben Sie kein schlechtes Gewissen, wenn Sie eine Erektion bekommen oder nass werden, weil Sie sich jemanden vorstellen

Ist Monogamie unnatürlich? Ist es eine psychische Störung, sexuelle Fantasien mit jemand anderem als Ihrem Ehepartner zu haben? Sollten Sie ...

Please don’t feel guilty if you get erection or wet by imagining someone

Is Monogamy Unnatural? Is it a mental disorder to have sexual fantasies with someone other than your spouse? Should you ...

Meine Beziehung zu meinem Vater

Wenn Vater sagt, dass ich für dich tot bin! Stellen Sie sich meinen Geisteszustand vor, als ich Waise wurde, als ...

My relationship with my father

When father says that I am dead for you! Imagine my mental state when I became an orphan when my ...

पिता के साथ मेरा सम्बन्ध

जब पिता कह दे कि मैं मर गया तेरे लिए! कल्पना करें मेरी उस मानसिक दशा की जबकि मैं बाप ...

Neues Kapitel im Leben, Herausforderungen und Lektionen

Ich gehöre auch zu denen, die Indien vor sieben Jahren verlassen haben. Früher habe ich dort Geschäfte gemacht und Steuern ...

New chapter in life, challenges and lessons

I am also one of them who left India 7 years back. Used to do business there and used to ...

जीवन का नया अध्याय, चुनौतियाँ और सबक

मैं भी उनमें से एक हूँ. 7 साल पहले भारत छोड़ के चला गया. वहाँ व्यापार करता था और टैक्स ...

Sexuell missbrauchte elfjährige Schwester und mein Schuldgefühl, dass ich sie nicht retten konnte!

Ich hatte nur eine jüngere Schwester, Para. Sie hat uns vor 17 Jahren für immer verlassen, bei einem Autounfall auf ...

This Post Has 4 Comments

  1. Deniz

    If a true philosopher is investigating many different viewpoints, it is for the purpose of investigating many different perspectives, as good philosophers have always done, so as to approach and arrive at ones own independent viewpoint. It’s a necessary process for all good philosophers to study many different perspectives and viewpoints, as knowledge evolves though a process of building on previous thought, so it’s necessary to know what the previous thought is. The more I’ve investigated and studied various perspectives and viewpoints, the more my clarity has increased. My main influences are, for scripture, the Gita, Upanishads, Dhammapada, and Bible, and for thinkers, Plato, Plotinus, Swedenborg, Kant, Hegel, Emile Durkheim, Max Weber, Max Horkheimer, Sigmund Freud, Carl Jung, Paramahansa Yogananda, and Ganesh Baba.

  2. Swami Balendu

    Dear Deniz,I know how much you have studied and that you actually really consider what you are reading or hearing and openly decide whether this is right for you or not. It becomes critical when people try to think everything is right at the same time because that does not work. It is always good to know what was before so that you can develop further but nobody should stick with what was then and mix it all up 🙂
    Thank you again for your comment and Much love

  3. Lucas

    In a way I feel this is the best of all followers whom you have described until now. In this way they don’t really get stuck with one person and worship him as the only right one but take the best from everywhere.

  4. Emily

    I agree with Lucas (above) that this kind of following is probably the best. The important point is that this follower takes what they like and agree with from all the different teachings and then synthesizes his/her own conclusive belief system. Maybe if they tried to memorize every mythological story or analogy that each guru said, then they would get mixed up. But if they really listen for the deeper meaning in all the lectures, I think they would actually find some simple commonalities among all the teachings that would be easy to believe in and follow.

Leave a Reply